Best Known (116, 185, s)-Nets in Base 4
(116, 185, 139)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (116, 185, 139)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 35, 9)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 8)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- the Hermitian function field over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 8)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (81, 150, 130)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 75, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 75, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (1, 35, 9)-net over F4, using
(116, 185, 347)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (116, 185, 347)-net over F4, using
(116, 185, 8148)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (116, 185, 8149)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (116, 184, 8149)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 602 264738 127547 768940 151513 302142 106060 779121 970110 996870 435967 940036 257936 476532 134070 101234 797163 408633 650436 > 4184 [i]