Best Known (152, 185, s)-Nets in Base 4
(152, 185, 1539)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (152, 185, 1539)-net over F4, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (152, 186, 1539)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 62, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 62, 513)-net over F64, using
(152, 185, 15479)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (152, 185, 15479)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(4185, 15479, F4, 33) (dual of [15479, 15294, 34]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4185, 16402, F4, 33) (dual of [16402, 16217, 34]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,16]) ⊂ C([1,16]) [i] based on
- linear OA(4169, 16385, F4, 33) (dual of [16385, 16216, 34]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16385 | 414−1, defining interval I = [0,16], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−16,−15,…,16}|+1 = 34 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(4168, 16385, F4, 16) (dual of [16385, 16217, 17]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16385 | 414−1, defining interval I = [1,16], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 17 [i]
- linear OA(416, 17, F4, 16) (dual of [17, 1, 17]-code or 17-arc in PG(15,4)), using
- dual of repetition code with length 17 [i]
- construction X applied to C([0,16]) ⊂ C([1,16]) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4185, 16402, F4, 33) (dual of [16402, 16217, 34]-code), using
(152, 185, large)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (152, 185, large)-net in base 4, because
- 31 times m-reduction [i] would yield (152, 154, large)-net in base 4, but