Best Known (139, 188, s)-Nets in Base 4
(139, 188, 531)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (139, 188, 531)-net over F4, using
- 10 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (139, 198, 531)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 66, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 66, 177)-net over F64, using
(139, 188, 576)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(139, 188, 576)-net in base 4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (138, 188, 576)-net in base 4, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (138, 189, 576)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (12, 63, 192)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 54, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 54, 192)-net over F128, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (12, 63, 192)-net in base 64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (138, 189, 576)-net in base 4, using
(139, 188, 1449)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (139, 188, 1449)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(4188, 1449, F4, 49) (dual of [1449, 1261, 50]-code), using
- 1260 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (14, 6, 3, 2, 2, 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 8 times 0, 1, 8 times 0, 1, 9 times 0, 1, 9 times 0, 1, 9 times 0, 1, 9 times 0, 1, 10 times 0, 1, 10 times 0, 1, 10 times 0, 1, 11 times 0, 1, 11 times 0, 1, 11 times 0, 1, 12 times 0, 1, 13 times 0, 1, 13 times 0, 1, 13 times 0, 1, 13 times 0, 1, 14 times 0, 1, 15 times 0, 1, 15 times 0, 1, 16 times 0, 1, 16 times 0, 1, 16 times 0, 1, 17 times 0, 1, 18 times 0, 1, 18 times 0, 1, 19 times 0, 1, 20 times 0, 1, 20 times 0, 1, 21 times 0, 1, 21 times 0, 1, 22 times 0, 1, 23 times 0, 1, 23 times 0, 1, 25 times 0, 1, 25 times 0, 1, 26 times 0, 1, 26 times 0, 1, 28 times 0, 1, 28 times 0, 1, 29 times 0, 1, 31 times 0, 1, 31 times 0, 1, 32 times 0, 1, 33 times 0, 1, 34 times 0, 1, 35 times 0, 1, 37 times 0, 1, 37 times 0, 1, 39 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(449, 50, F4, 49) (dual of [50, 1, 50]-code or 50-arc in PG(48,4)), using
- dual of repetition code with length 50 [i]
- 1260 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (14, 6, 3, 2, 2, 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 8 times 0, 1, 8 times 0, 1, 9 times 0, 1, 9 times 0, 1, 9 times 0, 1, 9 times 0, 1, 10 times 0, 1, 10 times 0, 1, 10 times 0, 1, 11 times 0, 1, 11 times 0, 1, 11 times 0, 1, 12 times 0, 1, 13 times 0, 1, 13 times 0, 1, 13 times 0, 1, 13 times 0, 1, 14 times 0, 1, 15 times 0, 1, 15 times 0, 1, 16 times 0, 1, 16 times 0, 1, 16 times 0, 1, 17 times 0, 1, 18 times 0, 1, 18 times 0, 1, 19 times 0, 1, 20 times 0, 1, 20 times 0, 1, 21 times 0, 1, 21 times 0, 1, 22 times 0, 1, 23 times 0, 1, 23 times 0, 1, 25 times 0, 1, 25 times 0, 1, 26 times 0, 1, 26 times 0, 1, 28 times 0, 1, 28 times 0, 1, 29 times 0, 1, 31 times 0, 1, 31 times 0, 1, 32 times 0, 1, 33 times 0, 1, 34 times 0, 1, 35 times 0, 1, 37 times 0, 1, 37 times 0, 1, 39 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(449, 50, F4, 49) (dual of [50, 1, 50]-code or 50-arc in PG(48,4)), using
(139, 188, 160412)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (139, 188, 160413)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (139, 187, 160413)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 38478 737158 352292 723570 541385 049142 181955 484708 341422 208275 474745 322105 638545 919246 901567 131197 964423 408547 790131 > 4187 [i]