Best Known (155, 189, s)-Nets in Base 4
(155, 189, 1539)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (155, 189, 1539)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (154, 189, 1539)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 63, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 63, 513)-net over F64, using
(155, 189, 14659)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (155, 189, 14659)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(4189, 14659, F4, 34) (dual of [14659, 14470, 35]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4189, 16406, F4, 34) (dual of [16406, 16217, 35]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,17]) ⊂ C([0,14]) [i] based on
- linear OA(4183, 16385, F4, 35) (dual of [16385, 16202, 36]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16385 | 414−1, defining interval I = [0,17], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−17,−16,…,17}|+1 = 36 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(4155, 16385, F4, 29) (dual of [16385, 16230, 30]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16385 | 414−1, defining interval I = [0,14], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−14,−13,…,14}|+1 = 30 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(46, 21, F4, 4) (dual of [21, 15, 5]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,17]) ⊂ C([0,14]) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4189, 16406, F4, 34) (dual of [16406, 16217, 35]-code), using
(155, 189, large)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (155, 189, large)-net in base 4, because
- 32 times m-reduction [i] would yield (155, 157, large)-net in base 4, but