Best Known (141, 190, s)-Nets in Base 4
(141, 190, 531)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (141, 190, 531)-net over F4, using
- 11 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (141, 201, 531)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 67, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 67, 177)-net over F64, using
(141, 190, 648)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(141, 190, 648)-net in base 4, using
- 41 times duplication [i] based on (140, 189, 648)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (14, 63, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 54, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 54, 216)-net over F128, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (14, 63, 216)-net in base 64, using
(141, 190, 1533)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (141, 190, 1533)-net over F4, using
(141, 190, 180059)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (141, 190, 180060)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (141, 189, 180060)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 615668 627158 739878 476105 644972 214245 707098 567756 510249 123202 933216 159720 376514 526484 716731 897333 680938 838700 406369 > 4189 [i]