Best Known (5, 20, s)-Nets in Base 4
(5, 20, 17)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (5, 20, 17)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 16)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 17, using
(5, 20, 39)-Net over F4 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (5, 20, 40)-net over F4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (5, 19, 40)-net over F4, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(419, 40, F4, 14) (dual of [40, 21, 15]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- linear OA(418, 24, F4, 14) (dual of [24, 6, 15]-code), but
- “Bou†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- linear OA(421, 40, F4, 16) (dual of [40, 19, 17]-code), but
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code would yield linear OA(421, 32, F4, 16) (dual of [32, 11, 17]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(45, 15, S4, 4), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 3328 / 3 > 45 [i]
- residual code [i] would yield OA(45, 15, S4, 4), but
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code would yield linear OA(421, 32, F4, 16) (dual of [32, 11, 17]-code), but
- linear OA(418, 24, F4, 14) (dual of [24, 6, 15]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(419, 40, F4, 14) (dual of [40, 21, 15]-code), but
(5, 20, 43)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (5, 20, 44)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (5, 19, 44)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 299064 681070 > 419 [i]