Best Known (149, 204, s)-Nets in Base 4
(149, 204, 531)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (149, 204, 531)-net over F4, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (149, 213, 531)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 71, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 71, 177)-net over F64, using
(149, 204, 576)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(149, 204, 576)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (13, 68, 192)-net in base 64, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (13, 70, 192)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 60, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 60, 192)-net over F128, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (13, 70, 192)-net in base 64, using
(149, 204, 1342)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (149, 204, 1342)-net over F4, using
(149, 204, 122407)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (149, 204, 122408)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (149, 203, 122408)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 165 296202 795684 485520 752410 023917 368415 483298 987841 652638 700753 189922 439297 806403 330028 340432 117562 618751 042454 332678 567236 > 4203 [i]