MinT - Best Known (28, 205, s)-Nets in Base 4

Best Known (28, 205, s)-Nets in Base 4

(28, 205, 34)-Net over F₄ — Constructive and digital

Digital (28, 205, 34)-net over F₄, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (21, 205, 34)-net over F₄, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F₄, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₄ with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
    - T₅ from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F₄ [i]

(28, 205, 42)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive

(28, 205, 42)-net in base 4, using

t-expansion [i] based on (27, 205, 42)-net in base 4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on (27, 41)-sequence in base 4, using
  - base expansion [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F₂, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂ with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
      - an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]

(28, 205, 55)-Net over F₄ — Digital

Digital (28, 205, 55)-net over F₄, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (26, 205, 55)-net over F₄, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 54)-sequence over F₄, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₄ with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 55, using
    - Drinfeld modules of rank 1 [i]

(28, 205, 101)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s

There is no (28, 205, 102)-net in base 4, because

5 times m-reduction [i] would yield (28, 200, 102)-net in base 4, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(4²⁰⁰, 102, S₄, 2, 172), but
  - the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that MÂ â‰¥ 578 423972 691467 524082 925894 528674 659849 854097 593746 066874 067695 865105 067331 772427 597040 559134 750874 241642 310521 895438 516224 / 173 > 4²⁰⁰ [i]