Best Known (153, 208, s)-Nets in Base 4
(153, 208, 531)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (153, 208, 531)-net over F4, using
- 11 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (153, 219, 531)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 73, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 73, 177)-net over F64, using
(153, 208, 576)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(153, 208, 576)-net in base 4, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (153, 210, 576)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (13, 70, 192)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 60, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 60, 192)-net over F128, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (13, 70, 192)-net in base 64, using
(153, 208, 1484)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (153, 208, 1484)-net over F4, using
(153, 208, 150319)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (153, 208, 150320)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (153, 207, 150320)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 42311 626540 719921 405980 149873 349280 662566 710623 573350 160397 964672 793827 197300 286056 086960 737602 944189 413415 627805 970409 360590 > 4207 [i]