Best Known (143, 214, s)-Nets in Base 4
(143, 214, 195)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (143, 214, 195)-net over F4, using
- 41 times duplication [i] based on digital (142, 213, 195)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 71, 65)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the rational function field F64(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 71, 65)-net over F64, using
(143, 214, 240)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(143, 214, 240)-net in base 4, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on (143, 220, 240)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (33, 110, 120)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 88, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 88, 120)-net over F32, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (33, 110, 120)-net in base 16, using
(143, 214, 593)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (143, 214, 593)-net over F4, using
(143, 214, 21356)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (143, 214, 21357)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (143, 213, 21357)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 173 499631 055370 632013 881409 546656 899643 284987 851655 859687 286337 588794 820972 434498 445452 585366 416710 892029 698068 464273 204438 626340 > 4213 [i]