Best Known (157, 214, s)-Nets in Base 4
(157, 214, 531)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (157, 214, 531)-net over F4, using
- 11 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (157, 225, 531)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 75, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 75, 177)-net over F64, using
(157, 214, 576)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(157, 214, 576)-net in base 4, using
- 44 times duplication [i] based on (153, 210, 576)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (13, 70, 192)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 60, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 60, 192)-net over F128, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (13, 70, 192)-net in base 64, using
(157, 214, 1474)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (157, 214, 1474)-net over F4, using
(157, 214, 143143)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (157, 214, 143144)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (157, 213, 143144)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 173 317303 518062 535650 776624 433615 259781 914545 411028 155070 949039 084289 324375 393495 588534 792556 699664 449955 821677 210516 174355 610828 > 4213 [i]