Best Known (62, 218, s)-Nets in Base 4
(62, 218, 66)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (62, 218, 66)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (49, 218, 66)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- T6 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F4, using
(62, 218, 99)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (62, 218, 99)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (61, 218, 99)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 98)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 61 and N(F) ≥ 99, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 98)-sequence over F4, using
(62, 218, 371)-Net over F4 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (62, 218, 372)-net over F4, because
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(4218, 372, F4, 156) (dual of [372, 154, 157]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(462, 215, S4, 39), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 12718 083503 539266 529007 190946 224090 701310 717998 449746 183117 383672 455579 566080 / 595 821431 971093 361396 591608 721211 764591 > 462 [i]
- residual code [i] would yield OA(462, 215, S4, 39), but
(62, 218, 417)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (62, 218, 418)-net in base 4, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 180395 440401 621828 101668 921541 434978 603377 732905 694061 506376 811955 455367 797258 273152 132411 105632 523521 192255 026604 489515 225674 557280 > 4218 [i]