Best Known (136, 219, s)-Nets in Base 4
(136, 219, 138)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (136, 219, 138)-net over F4, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (136, 220, 138)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (21, 63, 34)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- T5 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 157, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (21, 63, 34)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(136, 219, 379)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (136, 219, 379)-net over F4, using
(136, 219, 8516)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (136, 219, 8517)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (136, 218, 8517)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 177597 143078 329700 970420 361976 583099 204454 558839 800443 556389 014311 448500 752949 100916 473978 535825 202597 604088 504523 438986 008556 522816 > 4218 [i]