Best Known (140, 225, s)-Nets in Base 4
(140, 225, 139)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (140, 225, 139)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 43, 9)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 8)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- the Hermitian function field over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 8)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (97, 182, 130)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 91, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 91, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (1, 43, 9)-net over F4, using
(140, 225, 393)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (140, 225, 393)-net over F4, using
(140, 225, 8912)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (140, 225, 8913)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (140, 224, 8913)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 729 092231 515062 635749 226771 822359 526215 315659 915025 259643 836575 939185 671215 916205 197414 705337 657100 429722 528130 123813 324130 824585 825360 > 4224 [i]