Best Known (182, 225, s)-Nets in Base 4
(182, 225, 1539)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (182, 225, 1539)-net over F4, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (182, 231, 1539)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 77, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 77, 513)-net over F64, using
(182, 225, 10441)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (182, 225, 10441)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(4225, 10441, F4, 43) (dual of [10441, 10216, 44]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4225, 16384, F4, 43) (dual of [16384, 16159, 44]-code), using
- an extension Ce(42) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16383 = 47−1, defining interval I = [1,42], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 43 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4225, 16384, F4, 43) (dual of [16384, 16159, 44]-code), using
(182, 225, 7644403)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (182, 225, 7644404)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (182, 224, 7644404)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 726 840254 586119 635788 189339 989936 133335 104612 350036 587098 877508 257464 875744 046031 958582 102448 412595 895513 633842 490561 572773 715400 480648 > 4224 [i]