MinT - Best Known (141, 226, s)-Nets in Base 4

Best Known (141, 226, s)-Nets in Base 4

(141, 226, 140)-Net over F₄ — Constructive and digital

Digital (141, 226, 140)-net over F₄, using

(u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
1. digital (2, 44, 10)-net over F₄, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 9)-sequence over F₄, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₄ with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 10, using
      - an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
2. digital (97, 182, 130)-net over F₄, using
  - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 91, 65)-net over F₁₆, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F₁₆, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
        the Hermitian function field over F₁₆ [i]

(141, 226, 152)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive

(141, 226, 152)-net in base 4, using

trace code for nets [i] based on (28, 113, 76)-net in base 16, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (28, 115, 76)-net in base 16, using
  - base change [i] based on digital (5, 92, 76)-net over F₃₂, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F₃₂, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃₂ with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 76, using
        a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(141, 226, 400)-Net over F₄ — Digital

Digital (141, 226, 400)-net over F₄, using

Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i]

(141, 226, 9212)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s

There is no (141, 226, 9213)-net in base 4, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (141, 225, 9213)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4^mÂ â‰¥ 2912 994515 567946 114348 564568 176520 472372 058576 354806 648293 287649 511981 456601 781865 614131 788935 547059 882424 711609 916740 154552 836795 717710 > 4²²⁵ [i]