MinT - Best Known (64, 235, s)-Nets in Base 4

Best Known (64, 235, s)-Nets in Base 4

Digital (64, 235, 66)-net over F₄, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (49, 235, 66)-net over F₄, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F₄, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₄ with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
    - T₆ from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F₄ [i]

Digital (64, 235, 99)-net over F₄, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (61, 235, 99)-net over F₄, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 98)-sequence over F₄, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₄ with g(F) = 61 and N(F) ≥ 99, using
    - Drinfeld modules of rank 1 [i]

There is no digital (64, 235, 349)-net over F₄, because

3 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (64, 232, 349)-net over F₄, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(4²³², 349, F₄, 168) (dual of [349, 117, 169]-code), but
  - residual code [i] would yield OA(4⁶⁴, 180, S₄, 42), but
    - the linear programming bound shows that MÂ â‰¥ 387317 878288 940952 121032 892106 078533 601878 434569 146042 672353 835001 098548 766344 071344 765591 401529 344000 / 1135 320053 976181 914391 551986 355178 156290 618852 310180 915372 701779 > 4⁶⁴ [i]

There is no (64, 235, 425)-net in base 4, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (64, 234, 425)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4^mÂ â‰¥ 802 799436 370434 440484 413245 738487 826109 718982 172328 110790 077909 088640 026173 963067 969476 618126 219150 684414 980612 166483 568688 081036 235293 845248 > 4²³⁴ [i]