Best Known (179, 246, s)-Nets in Base 4
(179, 246, 531)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (179, 246, 531)-net over F4, using
- 12 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (179, 258, 531)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
(179, 246, 576)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(179, 246, 576)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (15, 82, 192)-net in base 64, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (15, 84, 192)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 72, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 72, 192)-net over F128, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (15, 84, 192)-net in base 64, using
(179, 246, 1504)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (179, 246, 1504)-net over F4, using
(179, 246, 129414)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (179, 246, 129415)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (179, 245, 129415)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 3197 404341 571926 456873 441434 254734 666533 862615 371697 828297 495515 117408 948883 039977 201866 459609 962897 169916 660293 889470 915741 117715 065214 710999 033720 > 4245 [i]