Best Known (70, 246, s)-Nets in Base 4
(70, 246, 66)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (70, 246, 66)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (49, 246, 66)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- T6 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F4, using
(70, 246, 105)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (70, 246, 105)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (70, 104)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 70 and N(F) ≥ 105, using
(70, 246, 414)-Net over F4 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (70, 246, 415)-net over F4, because
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(4246, 415, F4, 176) (dual of [415, 169, 177]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(470, 238, S4, 44), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 120510 936963 900302 789124 723066 073447 088671 101178 269184 854788 285280 658913 691603 030508 274974 720000 / 77708 615139 851578 435610 585674 497674 313378 544338 862201 > 470 [i]
- residual code [i] would yield OA(470, 238, S4, 44), but
(70, 246, 469)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (70, 246, 470)-net in base 4, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 13226 433779 086788 460548 665333 454675 993939 782902 105936 989763 765436 849976 481646 026105 834468 817902 872884 553651 776970 288694 756860 244760 937114 968075 371120 > 4246 [i]