MinT - Best Known (62, 251, s)-Nets in Base 4

Best Known (62, 251, s)-Nets in Base 4

(62, 251, 66)-Net over F₄ — Constructive and digital

Digital (62, 251, 66)-net over F₄, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (49, 251, 66)-net over F₄, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F₄, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₄ with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
    - T₆ from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F₄ [i]

(62, 251, 99)-Net over F₄ — Digital

Digital (62, 251, 99)-net over F₄, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (61, 251, 99)-net over F₄, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 98)-sequence over F₄, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₄ with g(F) = 61 and N(F) ≥ 99, using
    - Drinfeld modules of rank 1 [i]

(62, 251, 259)-Net over F₄ — Upper bound on s (digital)

There is no digital (62, 251, 260)-net over F₄, because

5 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (62, 246, 260)-net over F₄, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(4²⁴⁶, 260, F₄, 184) (dual of [260, 14, 185]-code), but
  - residual code [i] would yield linear OA(4⁶², 75, F₄, 46) (dual of [75, 13, 47]-code), but
    - â€œGurâ€ bound on codes from Brouwerâ€™s database [i]

(62, 251, 402)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s

There is no (62, 251, 403)-net in base 4, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (62, 250, 403)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4^mÂ â‰¥ 3 459746 883596 009473 415437 653655 000132 426065 380514 547375 994036 972188 995643 538324 706569 234734 382756 285461 027347 858792 672428 424562 794662 588402 291268 844192 > 4²⁵⁰ [i]