Best Known (145, 252, s)-Nets in Base 4
(145, 252, 137)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (145, 252, 137)-net over F4, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (145, 259, 137)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 72, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 187, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (15, 72, 33)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(145, 252, 296)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (145, 252, 296)-net over F4, using
(145, 252, 4831)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (145, 252, 4832)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (145, 251, 4832)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 13 231274 645942 020101 044935 266716 413375 079478 298042 911489 033534 266605 580208 931557 970189 143384 021202 516174 957216 026021 786063 535618 085669 816611 063228 149610 > 4251 [i]