Best Known (62, 254, s)-Nets in Base 4
(62, 254, 66)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (62, 254, 66)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (49, 254, 66)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- T6 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F4, using
(62, 254, 99)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (62, 254, 99)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (61, 254, 99)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 98)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 61 and N(F) ≥ 99, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 98)-sequence over F4, using
(62, 254, 257)-Net over F4 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (62, 254, 258)-net over F4, because
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(4254, 258, F4, 192) (dual of [258, 4, 193]-code), but
(62, 254, 401)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (62, 254, 402)-net in base 4, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 854 314872 771214 102828 472497 735407 239675 452164 528034 163630 088260 716909 650604 890916 390813 337021 365482 795341 674533 194889 488209 051387 856488 802786 427782 803996 > 4254 [i]