Best Known (62, 258, s)-Nets in Base 4
(62, 258, 66)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (62, 258, 66)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (49, 258, 66)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- T6 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F4, using
(62, 258, 99)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (62, 258, 99)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (61, 258, 99)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 98)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 61 and N(F) ≥ 99, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 98)-sequence over F4, using
(62, 258, 257)-Net over F4 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (62, 258, 258)-net over F4, because
- 4 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (62, 254, 258)-net over F4, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(4254, 258, F4, 192) (dual of [258, 4, 193]-code), but
(62, 258, 401)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (62, 258, 402)-net in base 4, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 249769 619373 631550 786066 196862 228055 931082 596561 781705 567714 545536 849476 928170 973688 359004 747583 957494 153552 040099 135804 627649 191503 025271 770440 518811 933184 > 4258 [i]