Best Known (146, 259, s)-Nets in Base 4
(146, 259, 137)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (146, 259, 137)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (145, 259, 137)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 72, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 187, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (15, 72, 33)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(146, 259, 278)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (146, 259, 278)-net over F4, using
(146, 259, 4252)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (146, 259, 4253)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (146, 258, 4253)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 216458 655276 707544 637434 049028 587504 876909 511948 195478 440930 338986 600721 753327 457669 107780 929026 888025 454354 764075 223254 069344 988526 615330 662333 463482 542620 > 4258 [i]