Best Known (148, 259, s)-Nets in Base 4
(148, 259, 137)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (148, 259, 137)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (145, 259, 137)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 72, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 187, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (15, 72, 33)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(148, 259, 294)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (148, 259, 294)-net over F4, using
(148, 259, 4699)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (148, 259, 4700)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (148, 258, 4700)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 214698 328350 196883 419781 480563 777987 312336 047946 701504 757858 914371 964138 407414 848628 821143 010597 402538 928500 855796 559471 902555 829857 060887 623500 871934 987908 > 4258 [i]