Best Known (21, 26, s)-Nets in Base 4
(21, 26, 65280)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (21, 26, 65280)-net over F4, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(426, 65280, F4, 5, 5) (dual of [(65280, 5), 326374, 6]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(426, 130561, F4, 5) (dual of [130561, 130535, 6]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(426, 130562, F4, 5) (dual of [130562, 130536, 6]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(1613, 65281, F16, 5) (dual of [65281, 65268, 6]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(426, 130562, F4, 5) (dual of [130562, 130536, 6]-code), using
- OOA 2-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(426, 130561, F4, 5) (dual of [130561, 130535, 6]-code), using
(21, 26, 65281)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (21, 26, 65281)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(426, 65281, F4, 2, 5) (dual of [(65281, 2), 130536, 6]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(426, 130562, F4, 5) (dual of [130562, 130536, 6]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(1613, 65281, F16, 5) (dual of [65281, 65268, 6]-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(426, 130562, F4, 5) (dual of [130562, 130536, 6]-code), using
(21, 26, large)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (21, 26, large)-net in base 4, because
- 3 times m-reduction [i] would yield (21, 23, large)-net in base 4, but