Best Known (145, 260, s)-Nets in Base 4
(145, 260, 137)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (145, 260, 137)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 72, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 188, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (15, 72, 33)-net over F4, using
(145, 260, 267)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (145, 260, 267)-net over F4, using
(145, 260, 3957)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (145, 260, 3958)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (145, 259, 3958)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 861422 400775 136679 784725 333745 567484 913317 920642 922686 906893 250001 656948 111873 785737 233156 764438 263617 207279 268088 578948 056069 854419 750897 001086 238549 886840 > 4259 [i]