Best Known (37, 260, s)-Nets in Base 4
(37, 260, 56)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (37, 260, 56)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 260, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
(37, 260, 66)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (37, 260, 66)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (37, 65)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 37 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
(37, 260, 130)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (37, 260, 131)-net in base 4, because
- 2 times m-reduction [i] would yield (37, 258, 131)-net in base 4, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(4258, 131, S4, 2, 221), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 8 580997 075163 262143 727375 998851 741521 586794 125179 131761 743079 323981 928979 247070 065153 199550 826818 193721 620389 239351 072546 402484 999645 804765 717535 363893 821440 / 37 > 4258 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(4258, 131, S4, 2, 221), but