Best Known (91, 260, s)-Nets in Base 4
(91, 260, 104)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (91, 260, 104)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (73, 260, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
(91, 260, 144)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (91, 260, 144)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (91, 143)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 91 and N(F) ≥ 144, using
(91, 260, 700)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (91, 260, 701)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (91, 259, 701)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 867253 092099 689743 705074 079522 009774 866001 007791 401022 360605 648005 631657 168241 948459 377275 564449 236186 193735 317708 244234 977627 250960 538708 978540 407840 108558 > 4259 [i]