Best Known (21, 33, s)-Nets in Base 4
(21, 33, 90)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (21, 33, 90)-net over F4, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (21, 34, 90)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 17, 45)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 44)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 45, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 44)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 17, 45)-net over F16, using
(21, 33, 112)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (21, 33, 112)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(433, 112, F4, 12) (dual of [112, 79, 13]-code), using
- 21 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 8 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(427, 85, F4, 12) (dual of [85, 58, 13]-code), using
- a “GraCyc†code from Grassl’s database [i]
- 21 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 8 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(427, 85, F4, 12) (dual of [85, 58, 13]-code), using
(21, 33, 2039)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (21, 33, 2040)-net in base 4, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 73 945655 076692 654875 > 433 [i]