Best Known (36, 49, s)-Nets in Base 4
(36, 49, 312)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (36, 49, 312)-net over F4, using
- 41 times duplication [i] based on digital (35, 48, 312)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 16, 104)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 16, 104)-net over F64, using
(36, 49, 387)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(36, 49, 387)-net in base 4, using
- 41 times duplication [i] based on (35, 48, 387)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (3, 16, 129)-net in base 64, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (3, 21, 129)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 18, 129)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 128)-sequence over F128, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- the rational function field F128(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 128)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 18, 129)-net over F128, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (3, 21, 129)-net in base 64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (3, 16, 129)-net in base 64, using
(36, 49, 686)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (36, 49, 686)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(449, 686, F4, 13) (dual of [686, 637, 14]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(449, 1037, F4, 13) (dual of [1037, 988, 14]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(12) ⊂ Ce(9) [i] based on
- linear OA(446, 1024, F4, 13) (dual of [1024, 978, 14]-code), using an extension Ce(12) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 45−1, defining interval I = [1,12], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 13 [i]
- linear OA(436, 1024, F4, 10) (dual of [1024, 988, 11]-code), using an extension Ce(9) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 45−1, defining interval I = [1,9], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 10 [i]
- linear OA(43, 13, F4, 2) (dual of [13, 10, 3]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(43, 21, F4, 2) (dual of [21, 18, 3]-code), using
- Hamming code H(3,4) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(43, 21, F4, 2) (dual of [21, 18, 3]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(12) ⊂ Ce(9) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(449, 1037, F4, 13) (dual of [1037, 988, 14]-code), using
(36, 49, 65395)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (36, 49, 65396)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (36, 48, 65396)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 79228 500890 750128 800650 565604 > 448 [i]