Best Known (15, 60, s)-Nets in Base 4
(15, 60, 33)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (15, 60, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
(15, 60, 35)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (15, 60, 35)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 34)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 35, using
(15, 60, 70)-Net over F4 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (15, 60, 71)-net over F4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (15, 59, 71)-net over F4, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(459, 71, F4, 44) (dual of [71, 12, 45]-code), but
- “Gur†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(459, 71, F4, 44) (dual of [71, 12, 45]-code), but
(15, 60, 71)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (15, 60, 72)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (15, 59, 72)-net in base 4, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(459, 72, S4, 44), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 3 514436 285559 452450 649732 945555 302087 917568 / 7 940309 > 459 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(459, 72, S4, 44), but