Best Known (28, s)-Sequences in Base 4
(28, 33)-Sequence over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (28, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- T5 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
(28, 41)-Sequence in Base 4 — Constructive
(28, 41)-sequence in base 4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (27, 41)-sequence in base 4, using
- base expansion [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- base expansion [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
(28, 54)-Sequence over F4 — Digital
Digital (28, 54)-sequence over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (26, 54)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 55, using
(28, 96)-Sequence in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (28, 97)-sequence in base 4, because
- net from sequence [i] would yield (28, m, 98)-net in base 4 for arbitrarily large m, but
- m-reduction [i] would yield (28, 290, 98)-net in base 4, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(4290, 98, S4, 3, 262), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 1171 356781 376623 073310 539939 549049 092006 382069 343339 273833 002633 655961 258104 534922 918618 475426 047061 070734 571873 612435 911168 064802 476773 730406 298590 562566 043253 049672 896239 108096 / 263 > 4290 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(4290, 98, S4, 3, 262), but
- m-reduction [i] would yield (28, 290, 98)-net in base 4, but