Best Known (23, 23+10, s)-Nets in Base 5
(23, 23+10, 138)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (23, 33, 138)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 5, 6)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 5)-sequence over F5, using
- Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 6, using
- the rational function field F5(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 5)-sequence over F5, using
- digital (18, 28, 132)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 14, 66)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 65)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 65)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 14, 66)-net over F25, using
- digital (0, 5, 6)-net over F5, using
(23, 23+10, 583)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (23, 33, 583)-net over F5, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(533, 583, F5, 10) (dual of [583, 550, 11]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(533, 624, F5, 10) (dual of [624, 591, 11]-code), using
(23, 23+10, 26725)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (23, 33, 26726)-net in base 5, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 116426 693308 764628 378905 > 533 [i]