Best Known (136−109, 136, s)-Nets in Base 5
(136−109, 136, 51)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (27, 136, 51)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 136, 51)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 50)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 51, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 50)-sequence over F5, using
(136−109, 136, 55)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (27, 136, 55)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (23, 136, 55)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 54)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 55, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 54)-sequence over F5, using
(136−109, 136, 137)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (27, 136, 138)-net in base 5, because
- 14 times m-reduction [i] would yield (27, 122, 138)-net in base 5, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(5122, 138, S5, 95), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 4298 350104 752369 269413 501600 679384 146953 677458 490777 611613 102571 208600 011232 192628 085613 250732 421875 / 221 979963 162672 > 5122 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(5122, 138, S5, 95), but