Best Known (137−109, 137, s)-Nets in Base 5
(137−109, 137, 51)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (28, 137, 51)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 137, 51)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 50)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 51, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 50)-sequence over F5, using
(137−109, 137, 55)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (28, 137, 55)-net over F5, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (23, 137, 55)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 54)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 55, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 54)-sequence over F5, using
(137−109, 137, 142)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (28, 137, 143)-net in base 5, because
- 10 times m-reduction [i] would yield (28, 127, 143)-net in base 5, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(5127, 143, S5, 99), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 16790 877570 883690 780699 267730 530691 899698 390565 322722 646512 433597 454361 233758 390881 121158 599853 515625 / 225753 948288 > 5127 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(5127, 143, S5, 99), but