Best Known (33, 33+13, s)-Nets in Base 5
(33, 33+13, 252)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (33, 46, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 23, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- the Hermitian function field over F25 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
(33, 33+13, 698)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (33, 46, 698)-net over F5, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(546, 698, F5, 13) (dual of [698, 652, 14]-code), using
- 61 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 0, 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 16 times 0, 1, 33 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(541, 632, F5, 13) (dual of [632, 591, 14]-code), using
- construction XX applied to C1 = C([623,10]), C2 = C([0,11]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,10]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([623,11]) [i] based on
- linear OA(537, 624, F5, 12) (dual of [624, 587, 13]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 54−1, defining interval I = {−1,0,…,10}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 13 [i]
- linear OA(537, 624, F5, 12) (dual of [624, 587, 13]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 54−1, defining interval I = [0,11], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 13 [i]
- linear OA(541, 624, F5, 13) (dual of [624, 583, 14]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 54−1, defining interval I = {−1,0,…,11}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 14 [i]
- linear OA(533, 624, F5, 11) (dual of [624, 591, 12]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 54−1, defining interval I = [0,10], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 12 [i]
- linear OA(50, 4, F5, 0) (dual of [4, 4, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(50, s, F5, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(50, 4, F5, 0) (dual of [4, 4, 1]-code) (see above)
- construction XX applied to C1 = C([623,10]), C2 = C([0,11]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,10]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([623,11]) [i] based on
- 61 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 0, 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 16 times 0, 1, 33 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(541, 632, F5, 13) (dual of [632, 591, 14]-code), using
(33, 33+13, 130744)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (33, 46, 130745)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (33, 45, 130745)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 28 422200 996757 360063 162814 544137 > 545 [i]