Best Known (35−15, 35, s)-Nets in Base 5
(35−15, 35, 56)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (20, 35, 56)-net over F5, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (20, 36, 56)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 18, 28)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 27)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 18, 28)-net over F25, using
(35−15, 35, 92)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (20, 35, 92)-net over F5, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (20, 36, 92)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 18, 46)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 45)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 46, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 45)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 18, 46)-net over F25, using
(35−15, 35, 2093)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (20, 35, 2094)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (20, 34, 2094)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 583053 575025 042811 135961 > 534 [i]