Best Known (43, 43+15, s)-Nets in Base 5
(43, 43+15, 262)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (43, 58, 262)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 8, 10)-net over F5, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 9)-sequence over F5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 10, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 9)-sequence over F5, using
- digital (35, 50, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 25, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- the Hermitian function field over F25 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 25, 126)-net over F25, using
- digital (1, 8, 10)-net over F5, using
(43, 43+15, 1256)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (43, 58, 1256)-net over F5, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(558, 1256, F5, 15) (dual of [1256, 1198, 16]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(2529, 628, F25, 15) (dual of [628, 599, 16]-code), using
- construction XX applied to C1 = C([623,12]), C2 = C([0,13]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,12]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([623,13]) [i] based on
- linear OA(2527, 624, F25, 14) (dual of [624, 597, 15]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 252−1, defining interval I = {−1,0,…,12}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 15 [i]
- linear OA(2527, 624, F25, 14) (dual of [624, 597, 15]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 252−1, defining interval I = [0,13], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 15 [i]
- linear OA(2529, 624, F25, 15) (dual of [624, 595, 16]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 252−1, defining interval I = {−1,0,…,13}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 16 [i]
- linear OA(2525, 624, F25, 13) (dual of [624, 599, 14]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 252−1, defining interval I = [0,12], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 14 [i]
- linear OA(250, 2, F25, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(250, s, F25, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(250, 2, F25, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code) (see above)
- construction XX applied to C1 = C([623,12]), C2 = C([0,13]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,12]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([623,13]) [i] based on
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(2529, 628, F25, 15) (dual of [628, 599, 16]-code), using
(43, 43+15, 415400)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (43, 58, 415401)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (43, 57, 415401)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 6939 000656 423795 157570 243824 932915 822925 > 557 [i]