Best Known (64−16, 64, s)-Nets in Base 5
(64−16, 64, 392)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (48, 64, 392)-net over F5, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(564, 392, F5, 16, 16) (dual of [(392, 16), 6208, 17]-NRT-code), using
- OA 8-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(564, 3136, F5, 16) (dual of [3136, 3072, 17]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(564, 3138, F5, 16) (dual of [3138, 3074, 17]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(15) ⊂ Ce(12) [i] based on
- linear OA(561, 3125, F5, 16) (dual of [3125, 3064, 17]-code), using an extension Ce(15) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 3124 = 55−1, defining interval I = [1,15], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 16 [i]
- linear OA(551, 3125, F5, 13) (dual of [3125, 3074, 14]-code), using an extension Ce(12) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 3124 = 55−1, defining interval I = [1,12], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 13 [i]
- linear OA(53, 13, F5, 2) (dual of [13, 10, 3]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(53, 24, F5, 2) (dual of [24, 21, 3]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 24 = 52−1, defining interval I = [0,1], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 3 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(53, 24, F5, 2) (dual of [24, 21, 3]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(15) ⊂ Ce(12) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(564, 3138, F5, 16) (dual of [3138, 3074, 17]-code), using
- OA 8-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(564, 3136, F5, 16) (dual of [3136, 3072, 17]-code), using
(64−16, 64, 2103)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (48, 64, 2103)-net over F5, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(564, 2103, F5, 16) (dual of [2103, 2039, 17]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(564, 3138, F5, 16) (dual of [3138, 3074, 17]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(15) ⊂ Ce(12) [i] based on
- linear OA(561, 3125, F5, 16) (dual of [3125, 3064, 17]-code), using an extension Ce(15) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 3124 = 55−1, defining interval I = [1,15], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 16 [i]
- linear OA(551, 3125, F5, 13) (dual of [3125, 3074, 14]-code), using an extension Ce(12) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 3124 = 55−1, defining interval I = [1,12], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 13 [i]
- linear OA(53, 13, F5, 2) (dual of [13, 10, 3]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(53, 24, F5, 2) (dual of [24, 21, 3]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 24 = 52−1, defining interval I = [0,1], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 3 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(53, 24, F5, 2) (dual of [24, 21, 3]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(15) ⊂ Ce(12) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(564, 3138, F5, 16) (dual of [3138, 3074, 17]-code), using
(64−16, 64, 367606)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (48, 64, 367607)-net in base 5, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 542 102699 355190 689022 884885 252449 785811 360225 > 564 [i]