Best Known (23, 23+16, s)-Nets in Base 5
(23, 23+16, 104)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (23, 39, 104)-net over F5, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (23, 40, 104)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 20, 52)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 51)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 52, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 51)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 20, 52)-net over F25, using
(23, 23+16, 112)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (23, 39, 112)-net over F5, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (23, 40, 112)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 20, 56)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 55)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 55)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 20, 56)-net over F25, using
(23, 23+16, 2399)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (23, 39, 2400)-net in base 5, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 1822 197614 302642 836543 877121 > 539 [i]