Best Known (39−17, 39, s)-Nets in Base 5
(39−17, 39, 56)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (22, 39, 56)-net over F5, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (22, 40, 56)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 20, 28)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 27)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 20, 28)-net over F25, using
(39−17, 39, 92)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (22, 39, 92)-net over F5, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (22, 40, 92)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 20, 46)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 45)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 46, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 45)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 20, 46)-net over F25, using
(39−17, 39, 1961)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (22, 39, 1962)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (22, 38, 1962)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 364 978379 034024 067050 785665 > 538 [i]