Best Known (29, 29+22, s)-Nets in Base 5
(29, 29+22, 104)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 51, 104)-net over F5, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (29, 52, 104)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 26, 52)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 51)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 52, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 51)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 26, 52)-net over F25, using
(29, 29+22, 112)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (29, 51, 112)-net over F5, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (29, 52, 112)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 26, 56)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 55)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 55)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 26, 56)-net over F25, using
(29, 29+22, 2128)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 51, 2129)-net in base 5, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 445422 188704 101809 356345 628756 503325 > 551 [i]