Best Known (74−23, 74, s)-Nets in Base 5
(74−23, 74, 252)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (51, 74, 252)-net over F5, using
- 8 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (51, 82, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 41, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- the Hermitian function field over F25 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 41, 126)-net over F25, using
(74−23, 74, 570)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (51, 74, 570)-net over F5, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(574, 570, F5, 23) (dual of [570, 496, 24]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(574, 635, F5, 23) (dual of [635, 561, 24]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,11]) ⊂ C([0,10]) [i] based on
- linear OA(573, 626, F5, 23) (dual of [626, 553, 24]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 626 | 58−1, defining interval I = [0,11], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−11,−10,…,11}|+1 = 24 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(565, 626, F5, 21) (dual of [626, 561, 22]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 626 | 58−1, defining interval I = [0,10], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−10,−9,…,10}|+1 = 22 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(51, 9, F5, 1) (dual of [9, 8, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(51, s, F5, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to C([0,11]) ⊂ C([0,10]) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(574, 635, F5, 23) (dual of [635, 561, 24]-code), using
(74−23, 74, 53396)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (51, 74, 53397)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (51, 73, 53397)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 1058 968153 062118 020697 919759 983107 982636 881537 685869 > 573 [i]