Best Known (99−25, 99, s)-Nets in Base 5
(99−25, 99, 312)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (74, 99, 312)-net over F5, using
- 51 times duplication [i] based on digital (73, 98, 312)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (18, 30, 104)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 15, 52)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 51)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 52, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 51)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 15, 52)-net over F25, using
- digital (43, 68, 208)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 34, 104)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 34, 104)-net over F25, using
- digital (18, 30, 104)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(99−25, 99, 1885)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (74, 99, 1885)-net over F5, using
(99−25, 99, 675384)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (74, 99, 675385)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (74, 98, 675385)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 315 548014 240317 678148 836919 662590 040992 189450 007552 348417 307507 238225 > 598 [i]