Best Known (56, 56+25, s)-Nets in Base 5
(56, 56+25, 252)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (56, 81, 252)-net over F5, using
- 11 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (56, 92, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 46, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- the Hermitian function field over F25 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 46, 126)-net over F25, using
(56, 56+25, 621)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (56, 81, 621)-net over F5, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(581, 621, F5, 25) (dual of [621, 540, 26]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(581, 624, F5, 25) (dual of [624, 543, 26]-code), using
(56, 56+25, 60400)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (56, 81, 60401)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (56, 80, 60401)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 82 726716 624466 397208 658014 617262 308435 921061 172839 737425 > 580 [i]