Best Known (90, 90+25, s)-Nets in Base 5
(90, 90+25, 504)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (90, 115, 504)-net over F5, using
- 51 times duplication [i] based on digital (89, 114, 504)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (32, 44, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 22, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- the Hermitian function field over F25 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 22, 126)-net over F25, using
- digital (45, 70, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 35, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 35, 126)-net over F25, using
- digital (32, 44, 252)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(90, 90+25, 5489)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (90, 115, 5489)-net over F5, using
(90, 90+25, 5774519)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (90, 115, 5774520)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (90, 114, 5774520)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 48 148335 877882 489772 439509 928533 088339 202976 524532 105048 456472 471531 997231 629313 > 5114 [i]