Best Known (92, 92+25, s)-Nets in Base 5
(92, 92+25, 504)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (92, 117, 504)-net over F5, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (92, 118, 504)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (33, 46, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 23, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- the Hermitian function field over F25 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 23, 126)-net over F25, using
- digital (46, 72, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 36, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 36, 126)-net over F25, using
- digital (33, 46, 252)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(92, 92+25, 6275)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (92, 117, 6275)-net over F5, using
(92, 92+25, 7551113)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (92, 117, 7551114)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (92, 116, 7551114)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 1203 707928 676959 657990 771448 226209 324718 858761 447527 432358 788410 137309 917576 531393 > 5116 [i]