Best Known (91, 91+26, s)-Nets in Base 5
(91, 91+26, 460)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (91, 117, 460)-net over F5, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (91, 118, 460)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (31, 44, 208)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 22, 104)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 22, 104)-net over F25, using
- digital (47, 74, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 37, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- the Hermitian function field over F25 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 37, 126)-net over F25, using
- digital (31, 44, 208)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(91, 91+26, 4763)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (91, 117, 4763)-net over F5, using
(91, 91+26, 2767418)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (91, 117, 2767419)-net in base 5, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 6018 557025 344068 241716 105872 017927 603198 995055 370368 284835 207614 529677 065555 663037 > 5117 [i]