Best Known (123−27, 123, s)-Nets in Base 5
(123−27, 123, 504)-Net over F5 — Constructive and digital
Digital (96, 123, 504)-net over F5, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (96, 124, 504)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (34, 48, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 24, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- the Hermitian function field over F25 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 24, 126)-net over F25, using
- digital (48, 76, 252)-net over F5, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 38, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 38, 126)-net over F25, using
- digital (34, 48, 252)-net over F5, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(123−27, 123, 5357)-Net over F5 — Digital
Digital (96, 123, 5357)-net over F5, using
(123−27, 123, 5139372)-Net in Base 5 — Upper bound on s
There is no (96, 123, 5139373)-net in base 5, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (96, 122, 5139373)-net in base 5, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 18 807953 143120 372812 330169 658872 894984 249510 290132 179710 897233 545084 889967 469377 848645 > 5122 [i]